|
The
overwhelming vote against a Regional Assembly in the north east
reflects a Britain that has no appetite for more government, more
red tape and more politicians.
Were
a Regional Assembly established here in the South West, powers would
move away from Bournemouth to Bristol at a tune of £41m a
year. This would not only increase council taxes, it would distance
the people from those who are supposed to represent them.
The
Lib Dems and Labour should review their policy of introducing such
an expensive talking shop and focus their attention on returning
the millions of pounds in government grants that have been redirected
from councils in the south of England to those in the north.
Local Lib Dems are claiming that the North
East's vote against a regional assembly could be 'good news for
Bournemouth' in that instead of joining a South West Assembly we
could form a regional government with other parts of the South of
England.
This
shows how out of touch they are with local residents who do not
want to see their taxes rise to pay for any form of regional government
no matter where it is. Lib Dems should remember that Bournemouth
opted for unitary status in 1997 in order to retain decision making
about Bournemouth in Bournemouth. A
Regional Assembly will only lead to the opposite; distancing voters
from the people they elect.
Conservatives are committed to maintaining a local government which
is both accountable to and accessible by local residents in Bournemouth.
Regional assemblies will be a costly experiment and end up pushing
council taxes even higher.
Notes:
Results of the referendum on an Assembly for the North East were
announced on Friday 5th November 2004. 696,519 (78%) voted against
and 197,310 (22%) voted in favour. Turnout was 47.8% of the region's
1.9 million voters.
For
more information please contact:
Tobias Ellwood
Conservative Parliamentary Candidate
Bournemouth East
Haviland Road West
Bournemouth
BH1 4JW
Email: Tobias@bournemoutheastconservatives.com
|